Article of the Month - 
	  September 2013
     | 
   
 
  	    Improving Land Governance for Development:
		Opportunities and Challenges for the Survey Profession
		Frank F. K. BYAMUGISHA, World Bank, Washington DC
		
		
		1)  This paper is an annotated 
		version of a keynote addressed by Frank Byamugisha from the World Bank 
		at the FIG Working Week, 6-10 May 2013 in Abuja, Nigeria.  The 
		central message of the paper is that surveyors and other land 
		professionals have an important role to play in improving land 
		governance in Africa, which is critical to unlocking the continent’s 
		potential of abundant land to end extreme poverty and boost shared 
		prosperity.  For further information about land administration and 
		reforms in Sub-Saharan Africa, Frank Byamigisha has just published the 
		book Securing Africa's Land for Shared Prosperity. Download the 
		book
		
		here. 
		ABSTRACT 
		This article is an annotated version of a keynote 
		address at the International Federation of Surveyors Working Week in 
		Abuja held May 6-10, 2013. The central message of the article is that 
		surveyors and other land professionals have an important role to play in 
		improving land governance in Africa, which is critical to unlocking the 
		continent’s potential of abundant land to end extreme poverty and boost 
		shared prosperity. Improving land governance and ending extreme poverty 
		within a 10 to 20 year period is not an insurmountable challenge if all 
		key stakeholders work in partnership to scale up successful innovations 
		and adopt global best practices. A new World Bank report proposes how to 
		do this via a 10-point program of reforms and investments estimated to 
		cost US$4.5 billion.  
		1. REFLECTING ON FIG’S AND AFRICA’S ACHIEVEMENTS
		
		The International Federation of Surveyors (FIG) 
		Working Week in Abuja, Nigeria presented an opportunity to reflect on 
		the achievements of FIG since its establishment in 1878. FIG has grown 
		in membership from one country to 120 countries over 135 years, and has 
		achieved significant success in its mission. For example, while 
		extending its global outreach, FIG has been able to set and maintain 
		high professional standards globally within its membership.  
		The FIG Working Week also presented an opportunity to 
		reflect on the development of Sub-Saharan Africa, the host of that 
		event. Africa’s economies have been going through a period of 
		unprecedented growth. Excluding South Africa, which grew at 3 percent in 
		2012, Sub-Saharan Africa grew at 5.8 percent per year, consolidating 
		more than a decade of growth at rates above 5 percent per year. World 
		Bank projections indicate that Sub-Saharan Africa will continue to grow 
		at about 6 percent per year for the next three years (except for South 
		Africa, with projected growth of 3 percent), while the global economy is 
		expected to grow at only 2.4 percent. In other words, Africa is 
		projected to grow twice as fast as the global economy. This is good 
		news.  
		2. BUT AFRICA’S RECENT GROWTH IS NOT REDUCING 
		POVERTY ENOUGH 
		While we were justified in celebrating Africa’s 
		achievements in Abuja, we cannot rest on our laurels. The greatest 
		challenge to mankind today is the 1.2 billion people on this planet 
		(about 22 percent of the population in the developing world) living in 
		extreme poverty, on less than US$1.25 a day. One-third of the people 
		living in extreme poverty, 400 million, are in Sub-Saharan Africa, with 
		nearly one out of every two Africans living in extreme poverty.  
		The co-existence of recent unprecedented growth and 
		high levels of extreme poverty in Africa is paradoxical. There is no 
		doubt that the strong economic growth of the last decade has reduced 
		poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa (in fact, it reduced by 10 percent, from 
		about 58 to 48 percent), but the growth impact on poverty has been 
		substantially less than that achieved in other regions of the world. 
		There are two main reasons: (i) inequality, and (ii) dependence on 
		natural resources, especially oil and minerals. These have dampened the 
		poverty-reducing impacts of income growth: growth has not produced jobs, 
		and the revenue from oil and minerals has not been spent on the poor. 
		Agriculture and manufacturing, the labor-intensive sectors that normally 
		produce jobs, have not participated in this growth except in a few 
		countries. To break the high-growth, high-poverty nexus, two critical 
		actions are required: spending revenue from oil and minerals on 
		people-centered investments such as education, health, and nutrition and 
		encouraging growth in the sectors that generate jobs and incomes for the 
		majority of the population, particularly agriculture. This article 
		focuses on the latter action, as it is more relevant for the majority of 
		African countries and is the one where surveyors and other land 
		professionals can more readily make a difference.  
		3. AGRICULTURE CAN END POVERTY IF THE POTENTIAL OF 
		AFRICA’S ABUNDANT LAND CAN BE UNLOCKED 
		In Africa, agriculture is the sector that produces 
		the most jobs, providing a livelihood to 70 percent of the population. 
		Growth in agriculture translates to a greater reduction in poverty than 
		does growth in other economic sectors, with analysts estimating 
		agriculture’s poverty-reduction impact to be significantly higher (World 
		Bank 2013). The challenge is to both boost agricultural productivity on 
		currently cultivated land and to put into production the vast amount of 
		currently unused land. Today, agricultural productivity in Africa is 
		about 25 percent of its potential: yields of maize, a staple food for 
		many people, stand at about 20 percent of that achieved at research 
		stations. Clearly there is still a lot of room for productivity growth 
		in agriculture for the sector to become a key driver of income and job 
		growth. There is even more room to boost agricultural incomes and jobs 
		from uncultivated land. Of the remaining and usable uncultivated land 
		worldwide, 202 million hectares (representing 47 percent of total 
		uncultivated land) are in Sub-Saharan Africa.  
		To cultivate the unused land and narrow the 
		productivity gap, Africa needs to invest substantially more in 
		agriculture. Investment in African agriculture has historically been 
		low. But since around 2008, a combination of factors (including the food 
		crisis, the commodity boom, and the financial crisis in America and 
		Europe) has led to increased interest from investors to acquire land for 
		large-scale agriculture globally. Two-thirds of the land acquired has 
		been in Africa, prompting some critics to call it the “New Scramble for 
		Africa.” But why has this become a bigger issue in Africa than in other 
		regions of the world? The answer is that virtually all (about 90 
		percent) rural land in Africa is undocumented. As is commonly known, 
		undocumented land is vulnerable to land grabbing and to expropriation 
		with little or no compensation. Documentation of land is critical not 
		only to protect local communities but also to provide security to 
		investors. Increasing the bargaining power of local communities to reach 
		a win-win agreement with investors is good for investment. In turn, 
		increased investment and local participation are good for agriculture, 
		the economy, employment and incomes, yielding a considerable impact on 
		reducing extreme poverty (World Bank 2013). This is where land 
		surveyors, other land professionals, and FIG can best contribute 
		professionally.  
		4. ACCELERATING LAND DOCUMENTATION AND GOVERNANCE IS 
		KEY TO BOOSTING AGRICULTURE AND ENDING POVERTY 
		But the million dollar question is this: If Africa 
		has documented less than 10 percent of its rural land in the last 50 
		years of its independence and if only about 25 percent of the total land 
		worldwide is documented, is it really feasible to document the remaining 
		90 percent of Africa’s rural land in the next 10 to 20 years? And the 
		challenge does not stop with rural land; there are also urban slums to 
		reckon with, home to 70 percent of Africa’s urban population. In my 
		view, the answer is yes, if we are strategic and focused in our 
		approach. Expedited documentation of land is an area in which surveyors 
		and other land professionals can make a real difference, but we need to 
		change the way we do business. We must ensure that we serve more people 
		and accomplish more with less, and in a much shorter time than we have 
		done in the last 135 years when FIG was first founded. It can be done 
		but we need to learn from the contemporary history of land 
		administration reform and act on recent lessons.  
		China and Vietnam provide relevant examples. China in 
		1978 and Vietnam in 1988 dismantled their collective farms and used 
		long-term leases to allocate land rights to farming households. In 
		China, this policy action launched an era of prolonged agricultural 
		growth that transformed rural China and led to the largest reduction in 
		poverty in history. The percentage of people living in extreme poverty 
		declined from about 80 percent of the population in 1981, the highest in 
		the world at that time, to only 13 percent in 2008. Similarly, Vietnam’s 
		land reform has also engineered remarkable agricultural growth and 
		economic transformation in the last two decades, reducing extreme 
		poverty there from 58 percent in the early 1990s to 14.5 percent in 
		2008.  
		Surveyors and land professionals should note that the 
		land tenure reforms that introduced long-term leases in China and 
		Vietnam were not accompanied by use of any spatial frameworks or 
		cadastral mapping to delineate household land. In fact, Vietnam started 
		developing a spatial framework for rural land holdings about five years 
		ago, while China is only starting to do so now using satellite imagery. 
		In other words, both China and Vietnam allocated land rights to 
		households without a spatial framework, and certainly not one based on a 
		detailed survey of boundaries. Similarly, when Thailand developed its 
		Land Code in 1954, it provided for recognition of a continuum of rights, 
		with seven categories of land rights recorded using spatial frameworks 
		of varying degrees of detail, from doing without a cadastral map (not 
		even a sketch) to using orthophotos to ultimately using cadastral maps 
		based on detailed surveys of boundaries.  
		It is not just Asian countries that have exercised 
		flexibility in allocating a continuum of land rights to their people and 
		in surveying their land. England and Wales have long used the general 
		boundaries rule to document rural land using large-scale base maps. In 
		Africa, significant progress in this direction has been made in the last 
		10 years. In three years, from 2003 to 2005, Ethiopia issued land use 
		certificates for 20 million land parcels without even a sketch map. In 
		June 2012, Rwanda completed a country-wide program to adjudicate and 
		demarcate 10.3 million land parcels mainly using orthophoto maps. These 
		land administration reform programs, combined with other agricultural 
		and economic interventions, have done wonders for the economies of 
		Ethiopia and Rwanda. Both economies have grown at 8-10 percent per year 
		in the last half decade. As a result, Ethiopia reduced extreme poverty 
		from over 40 percent to 30 percent in the last 10 years, while Rwanda 
		reduced it from 55 percent to 40 percent in the same period.  
		Other African countries are following in the 
		footsteps of Ethiopia and Rwanda in exercising flexibility to award and 
		document land rights. Nigeria, Tanzania, Uganda, Mozambique, Namibia, 
		Madagascar, Benin, Côte d’Ivoire, and Burkina Faso have land legislation 
		that permits flexibility in measuring rural land boundaries. Pilots have 
		been undertaken in these countries to take advantage of the favorable 
		legislation.  
		5. NEED TO ACT DIFFERENTLY, FASTER AND TAKE 
		ADVANTAGE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGY 
		The lessons from experience are inspiring and provide 
		hope and guidance. To continue and expand on these successes in Africa, 
		we land professionals must lead the way. We need to act with a sense of 
		urgency. We need to move away from rigid surveying standards and 
		technologies to more flexible ones that meet today’s needs while 
		anticipating those of tomorrow. Relevance has to be our guiding 
		principle, not accuracy: given limited budgets, we must balance accuracy 
		with speed and cost when designing spatial frameworks. And we must take 
		advantage of the opportunities offered by modern technology.  
		A growing number of people are already advocating and 
		carrying forward these ideals in various forms and shapes, with a 
		variety of names and labels. For example, Stig Enemark (2012) calls it 
		“Spatially Fit-for-Purpose”. Robin McLaren (2011) calls it “Crowd 
		Sourcing”. Michael Barry, Molero and Muhsen (2013) call it the “talking 
		titler” while the Global Land Tool Network calls it a “Social Tenure 
		Domain Model” (UN-Habitat 2008). Common to all of these high-flying 
		initiatives is the desire for simple, affordable, fast, and 
		community-supported approaches to designing spatial frameworks and to 
		recording land rights and related information. The initiators are not 
		mere research academics, intellectual dreamers, or knuckleheads, but 
		rather well-meaning social innovators. Let us work with them to test 
		these initiatives, scale up the successful ones, and most importantly, 
		learn from those that fail. We need to appraise these and other 
		investments and technologies to ensure that they are technically, 
		economically, socially, and environmentally sound to meet the needs of 
		society. The bottom line is that we need practical and bold new 
		solutions to document the land rights of billions of people in rural 
		areas and urban slums to get them out of informality and extreme 
		poverty.  
		We must redouble our efforts to remove inflexible 
		surveying regulations, but we must also go beyond regulations. We must 
		deal head on with educational and research institutions to ensure those 
		education curricula for surveyors and other professionals move away from 
		serving only a few people with over-engineered and costly solutions. We 
		must instead be able to serve the masses, to recognize a continuum of 
		land rights, and to focus on recording rights quickly and cheaply. We 
		should not fix land boundaries in a costly way and in lengthy processes 
		that take decades to complete national programs. The required changes go 
		beyond educational and research institutions. The organization of work 
		in ministries of lands, Land Commissions, and survey and mapping 
		agencies must also change. Change is also needed among suppliers and 
		service providers such as consultancy firms; and change must also reach 
		advocacy groups and development partners. Simply put, the mindsets and 
		attitudes of all key stakeholders in land governance must change  
		6. NEED TO SCALE UP SUCCESSFUL INNOVATIONS AND 
		GLOBAL BEST PRACTICES 
		Surveyors and other land professionals must be at the 
		front and center of this massive change. Let us modernize and simplify 
		surveying and mapping regulations to take advantage of modern technology 
		to do things faster and cheaper. Let us also move forward with piloting 
		new innovations and scaling up global best practices and pilots that are 
		successful. For those that fail, let us learn from them to do better. 
		Let us learn from the experiences of China, Vietnam, Thailand, Ethiopia, 
		Rwanda, and many others. As professionals, we can and should position 
		ourselves to play a central role in fighting extreme poverty, today’s 
		greatest challenge to mankind.  
		We at the World Bank are ready to work in 
		partnership... We have prepared ourselves to support sound land 
		governance with a combination of policy reforms and investments. In July 
		2013, after four years of review, we launched a report on improving land 
		governance in Sub-Saharan Africa in a 10-point program that includes not 
		only documenting land rights but also increasing land access for the 
		poor, increasing efficiency in land administration, developing land 
		administration in post-conflict countries, developing capacity, 
		resolving land disputes, improving land use planning, improving 
		management of public land, and strengthening property valuation and land 
		tax policies (Byamugisha 2013). This US$4.5 billion program will be 
		implemented over 10 years, and we are looking forward to the support of 
		all stakeholders to make it a reality.  
		7. CONCLUSIONS 
		Eradicating extreme poverty is a formidable challenge 
		but surveyors and other land professionals should see this as an 
		opportunity to make a positive difference and improve the lives of 
		people. But we have to act differently and with a lot of flexibility and 
		urgency. The World Bank is seeking to strengthen partnerships in all 
		possible ways, especially at the country level and with FIG, to improve 
		land governance for development.  
		With support from all our partners, we are confident 
		that extreme poverty will be eradicated by 2030, precisely when FIG will 
		be 152 years old. Our work must begin now. And we must do so with a 
		sense of urgency.  
		REFERENCES 
		Barry, M., R. Molero, and A. Muhsen. 2013. 
		“Evolutionary land tenure information system development: the talking 
		titler methodology.” International Federation of Surveyors Article of 
		the Month. February 2013. 
		 
		Byamugisha, F.F.K. 2013. Securing Africa’s Land for Shared Prosperity: A 
		Program to Scale up Policy Reforms and Investments. Africa Development 
		Forum Series. Washington, DC: World Bank. 
		 
		Enemark, S. 2012. “Sustainable Land Governance: Spatially enabled, fit 
		for purpose, and supporting the global agenda.” Paper presented at the 
		Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty, Washington DC, April 
		23-26. 
		 
		McLaren, R.A. 2011. “Crowd-sourcing Support of Land Administration: A 
		new, collaborative partnership between citizens and land professions.” 
		RICS Research. 
		 
		UN-HABITAT. 2008. Secure Land Rights for All. Nairobi. Accessed at: 
		
		http://www.responsibleagroinvestment.org/rai/sites/responsibleagroinvestment.org/files/Secure%20land%20rights%20for%20all-UN%20HABITAT.pdf
		 
		 
		World Bank. 2013. “Africa’s Pulse: An Analysis of Issues Shaping 
		Africa’s Economic Future.” April 2013, Vol. 7. World Bank, Washington, 
		DC.  
		BIOGRAPHICAL NOTES 
		Frank F. K. Byamugisha is an Operations Adviser and 
		Lead Land Specialist in the Africa Region of the World Bank. The article 
		is based on a book he authored, Securing Africa’s Land for Shared 
		Prosperity, published and launched by the World Bank in July 2013: 
		http://publications.worldbank.org/19810. The findings, interpretations 
		and conclusions expressed in this article are those of the author and do 
		not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of 
		Executive Directors, or the governments they represent.  
		CONTACTS
		Frank F. K. Byamugisha 
		Email: 
		Fbyamugisha@worldbank.org 
		  
		
		
		  
		Securing Africa's Land for Shared Prosperity 
		by Frank F. K. Byamugisha 
		
		
		Download 
		    |