| 
        JOINT COMMISSION WORKING GROUP ON 
      UNDER-REPRESENTED GROUPS IN SURVEYING 
       
       
      
       
      Visit the Web site of the
      FIG Working Group on Under-represented Groups in Surveying 
      
       
      This  Newsletter in -pdf-format 
      Contents
      Mixed Message: Conflicting Images Emerge
      from Spring Conference 
      by Wendy J. Woodbury Straight, USA 
      What is New in FIG Concerning
      Under-represented Groups in Surveying 
      by Gabriele Dasse, Germany 
      Personalities: Diane A. Dumashie, United
      Kingdom 
      Why are Young Women Attracted to
      Survey Education in Sweden 
      by Boo G. Lilje, Sweden 
       
    Mixed Message:
    Conflicting Images Emerge from Spring Conference
    by Wendy J. Woodbury Straight, USA
    Reprinted by permission from Progress
    & Perspectives May-June 2002. 
    Gender mainstreaming was a major theme in the wings of the
    spring surveyors' conference in Washington, DC. Speakers highlighted the
    success of female surveyors in Germany, the United Kingdom, Sweden, Austria,
    and the United States. Other presenters were on hand to discuss the global
    issue of women's access to land, examining the surveyor's role in the equal
    application of title and registration development. 
    However, a few other events at the convention pointed
    backward. First, a sexist display found its way into the sprawling exhibit
    hall. Second, the national surveyors' association, which is 97 per cent
    male, featured a presentation for the recruitment of boys. Third, a
    longstanding forum for women in surveying failed to find a new leader. It
    subsequently disbanded. 
    On the Plus Side
    Two sessions for presenters, organized by Gabriele Dasse
    (Germany) and Gail Oliver (U.S.), comprised a joint meeting of the
    Task Force on Under-represented Groups in Surveying and the Forum for Equal
    Opportunity. The Task Force is sponsored by Commission 1 (Professional
    Standards and Practice) and Commission 2 (Professional Education) of the
    International Federation of Surveyors (FIG). The Forum falls under the
    auspices of the National Society of Professional Surveyors (NSPS), a member
    organization of the American Congress on Surveying and Mapping (ACSM.) The
    joint sessions were held on April 24. 
    
      
        
		  | 
        
           The first session: from left Gail Oliver, Gerda
          Schennach, Gabriele Dasse, Karin Haldrup, Wendy J. Woodbury Straight  | 
       
     
    In addition to a report on the 20-year history of the Forum,
    participants in the two sessions heard the following presentations:
    Challenges for Women in a Changing Profession (Gerda Schennach,
    Austria); Wanted: Women Engineers (Gabriele Dasse, Germany); Mainstreaming
    Gender Issues in Land Administration: Awareness, Attention, and Action (Karin
    Haldrup, Denmark); Why Are Young Women Attracted to Survey Education in
    Sweden (Boo G. Lilje, Sweden); and A Gender for Change: The Future
    for Women in Surveying (Pat Turrell, United Kingdom). 
    Women's issues were addressed elsewhere at the conference as
    well. On April 23, Agneta Ericsson of Sweden had presented a related
    topic, Women's Access to Land, in a session on land administration sponsored
    by FIG Commission 7 (topics in Cadastre and Land Management). Highlights
    from each paper will be featured in upcoming editions of this newsletter.
    Published papers may be found in the proceedings of the conference. 
    Universal Issues
    The importance of role models was a consistent theme
    throughout the presentations. Group discussion revolved around the idea of a
    "critical mass," the percentage of women within an institution or
    an industry that suddenly allows newcomers to feel welcome. 
    Such a number has been achieved by educational institutions
    in Sweden, quickly establishing a gender balance that better reflects the
    country's demographics. 
    Another common theme was the importance of professional
    associations in the recruitment and retention of young women into the
    surveying and mapping arena. Numbers suggest that the more women there are
    in the profession, the easier it is for them to participate in efforts to
    enhance the professional environment. 
    For example, the geomatics industry in Germany has a
    significantly higher percentage of female involvement than does the
    surveying industry in the United States. Yet, unlike America, Germany has no
    shortage of established women who are able to engage in recruitment and
    retention activities targeted toward young women in geomatics. 
    Equality in land tenure was another common topic of
    discussion. An example of an organization working to monitor women's access
    to land is Swedesurvey, a state-owned company that serves as a consultant
    for land management, GIS, and geospatial solutions around the world. 
    Through cultural, religious, or legislative traditions,
    women and men are often treated differently with regard to land. Swedesurvey
    advocates the equal allocation of land through the use of efficient
    administration systems. 
    Discrimination Still Found in America
    In spite of an ACSM policy calling for exhibit displays that
    "represent the professional image of the industry," a company
    relatively new to the surveying software market featured "booth
    babes," female models in shorts and tee shirts. Oliver, who is the
    outgoing chair of the Forum, asked if the firm would be willing to feature
    male models in similar clothing, to which the reply was, "Absolutely
    not." Indicating the lack of clout wielded by America's small
    percentage of females in today's industry, a company spokesperson told
    Oliver that the use of female models was a business decision that seemed to
    be working. 
    Equally disheartening for women at the convention was the
    appearance of a workshop sponsored by NSPS to educate young boys about the
    surveying profession, "thereby giving the future generation an insight
    into our profession and possibly recruiting the next generation of
    professional surveyors." 
    The program was intended to augment the Boy Scout Surveying
    Merit Badge, which was developed by NSPS several years ago. Because there is
    no similar merit badge at the Girl Scout level, NSPS has struggled to
    provide equal opportunity for girls. To date, NSPS has no educational
    program aimed at both girls and boys of middle-school age, but it does offer
    the gender-neutral Trigstar program for high school students. 
    The low percentage of women in United States surveying has
    had other repercussions. Contractors have used the low numbers to argue that
    they cannot fulfill minority set-asides. 
    Another downside of the poor representation of women has
    been the burnout rate of women who have been active in their professional
    associations. With few women in the ranks, those who participate are often
    asked to serve on more than a normal share of committees. They do so
    courteously, in order to present themselves as role models, but they are
    quickly exhausted from carrying multiple loads. 
    The NSPS Forum for Equal Opportunity was formerly known as
    the Forum for Women in Surveying. The DC conference was the termination of
    Oliver's second consecutive term as chair of the group. 
    Conference participants noted that the expense of travel is
    one reason that no successor for Oliver has been found; another reason is
    the reprioritization of family life in post-9/11 America. In the past
    several months, many surveyors, both male and female, have found it
    emotionally necessary to work more closely to their homes. 
    The conference took place from April 19 through April 26. It
    was known as the XXII FIG International Congress, and as the ACSM Annual
    Conference. The convention was produced in conjunction with the Annual
    Conference of the American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing,
    and it was co-sponsored by the Appraisal Institute. 
    By Wendy J. Woodbury Straight, e-mail: wendy@netsync.net  
  
       
       
    What is New in FIG
    Concerning Under-represented Groups in Surveying
    by Gabriele Dasse, Germany
    The time span of the FIG Task Force on Under-represented
    Groups was limited and ended in 2002 with the FIG Congress in Washington.
    Task Force Chair Gabriele Dasse informed the members of the General
    Assembly about the Task Force activities with a final report and she got the
    opportunity to give a speech during the General Assembly. All information
    concerning the Task Force are still available on the following homepage: http://www.fig.net/figtree/tf/underrep/tfunrep.htm  
    
      
        
		  | 
        
           Gabriele Dasse during the General Assembly  | 
       
     
    Under the lead of FIG Commission 1 now a Working Group
    Under-represented Groups in Surveying is established. This is a Joint
    working group with other FIG Technical Commissions. 
    Policy issues
    
      - 
        
Survey the role of minorities in the world of surveying
        and the benefit of diversity.  
      - 
        
Analyse the present status of under-represented groups
        and be aware of good practices concerning the support of
        under-represented groups in FIG member associations, in professions and
        at universities.  
      - 
        
Enhance fair competition for minority groups.  
     
    Chair
    Gabriele Dasse (Germany), e-mail: gabriele.dasse@gv.hamburg.de  
    Specific Projects
    
      - 
        
Continuing with a FIG network for under-represented
        groups in surveying to enhance the distribution of information.  
      - 
        
Intensify the work within the FIG Commissions to support
        women and cultural and language minorities.  
      - 
        
Evaluation of FIG Washington Congress registration
        concerning gender, age, commissions and continents.  
      - 
        
Organise joint Commission working group meetings or
        workshops during the working weeks.  
     
    Publications
    
    Final report
    In the Munich Congress. 
       
    
    
      
          | 
        Diane A Dumashie, PhD., BSc., MRICS is the
          FIG UK delegate Commission 8 (Spatial planning and development) and
          chairs the working groups focusing on Mega-city urbanisation/ informal
          settlements and public liaison tools in Coastal Cities. Her aim is to
          facilitate communication, collaboration and exchange of ideas.
          Attending two working weeks and one congress encourages her that the
          FIG framework is able to deliver this objective. | 
       
     
    Although in the early 1990's she was seconded onto a Commission
    7 working group to lend her experience to coastal issues, over the past two
    years Diane's involvement is with Commission 8. She is keen to utilise her
    skills and experience in project development management and technical
    experience in land ownership strategies, including specialist knowledge in
    Marine Resource management and facilitating sustainable development in
    maritime areas. Motivated by the Under represented Surveyors group, and the
    interest that this generates, Diane's aim over the next four years is to
    seek to involve the network in her working group areas particularly focusing
    on gender, informal settlements, housing and coastal issues associated with
    cities. There is opportunity for this to work across commissions. 
    To achieve the Commission objectives Diane draws from her
    experience spread over 18 years. With over ten years at senior levels, she
    manages development, monitor and evaluate large-scale projects including,
    financial appraisals and fiscal evaluations, preparation of instructions
    for, and negotiations of complex legal documentation. This combines with an
    understanding in both corporate industry and SME's business development,
    acquired due to involvement in decision making allied to board level. 
    Three years ago, Dumashie Associates was founded in order to
    utilise her long experience of trouble-shooting, path-smoothing and adding
    value to complex developments, with a specialism in difficult areas such as
    coastal areas, but also redundant urban/ industrialised land. The focus of
    Diane's work is increasingly orientated to community level. 
    Diane specialises in integrating land economics and business
    strategies with environmental and sustainable issues. This may be working
    for the public or private sector. She has monitored and evaluated central,
    regional and local government environmental policy in Integrated Coastal
    Area Management (ICAM). Experience gained in an Environmental Consultancy
    provides a full under-standing of the engineering constraints along
    waterfront land. This adds to her research capability in Marine Resource
    Management and interest in community development issues relating to ICAM,
    which combined with Cadastre experience enables her to add significant value
    in land, real estate and community development of the land/ marine
    environmental interface. 
    She's steered projects in London and on Merseyside in the UK
    - and internationally on sites as far apart as Ghana, Hawaii, the USA,
    Poland and Brussels. Such as helping British Gas release profit from a 100
    acre former coastal oil refinery land it no longer needed. Advised corporate
    aggregate operator on how to make better use of riverside site adjacent to
    the London Dome. Worked with New Town commissions to seek ways to maximise
    best value associated with their landholdings in the context of community
    objectives. Project managed large development sites to build up to 1,500 new
    homes for all sectors of society. As well as helped doctors build modern
    surgeries in environmentally sensitive areas. 
    Chronologically Diane entered surveying as a graduate,
    trained for a period at the Greater London Council and a leading asset
    management Property Consultancy. Then moved into the Corporate sector for
    Allied Lyons, then as a project manager for Marks & Spencers, helping it
    to find and upgrade land for its stores and distribution centres. She became
    a senior surveyor with Marriott, helping it to grow its hotel business, then
    became a development consultant with GVA Grimley before setting up her own
    business. Along the way in the corporate sector she's acted as property
    director and guided the successful take-over of a 150-outlet chain of pizza
    restaurants, as well as involvement with the environmental sector assisting
    the oil and gas, ports and aggregates sectors in coastal and marine areas). 
    Diane desire to share best practice extends to the local
    level where she also participates in national and local committees of the
    RICS covering issues relating to coastal lands and education. Diane's
    current key area of work is allied to sustainable planning approaches
    involving the community to regenerate public land and property for housing.
    Working to foster the transfer of knowledge and skills Diane welcomes
    contact from the members of the Under represented surveyors groups. 
    Diane A Dumashie, tel + 44 20 8994 4213; mobile + 44
    797 424 7748; email: 
	atfchair_p@ymail.com. 
    Keta House, 1 Worgret Hill, Wareham, Dorset BH20 6AD, United Kingdom.  
  
       
       
    Why Are Young
    Women Attracted to Survey Education in Sweden
    by Boo G. Lilje, Sweden
    
      
          | 
        
           Boo G. Lilje  | 
       
     
    Surveying in Sweden is the ideal educational programme for
    those interesting in engineering, law and economics. 
    Education of surveyors started in Sweden 1628. The education
    was in the beginning concentrated on map production. In the middle of the
    18th century re-allotment of Swedish rural land was the main task of the
    Surveyors. Knowledge in legal matters as well as in economic subjects was
    expected. 
    The education was organised by The National Land Survey. In
    1936 the first surveyors graduated with a MSc from The Swedish Royal
    Institute of Technology, Stockholm (KTH). Education is from 1992 conducted
    even at Lund Technical Institute (LTH). 
    The first female Land Surveyor graduated in 1963. Thus it
    took 335 years before Sweden got its first female Land Surveyor. Other male
    occupations were Forestry Officer and Veterinary Surgeon. It was for the
    next ten years (1962 - 1972) still unusual with female students at the
    Surveying Program. Only 13 females graduated out of a total number of 338
    (3,8%). The number of female Land Surveyors increased considerable during
    the next ten years (1973 - 1982) and out of 467 graduates all together, 107
    were females (22,9%). This development continued during the next ten years
    (38,9%) and nowadays the female Land Surveyors are in majority. During the
    last ten years the female graduates are 52,6% out of all graduates. 
    The Land Survey Education in Sweden is a comparatively small
    Educational Program. It is therefore important to make the education known
    to the students in compulsory school. As competence in highest grade of
    mathematics is required, the marketing of the Education should start early
    to interest the young ones to choose the line of natural science. These
    efforts do not differ between boys and girls. However first priority is to
    make the education well known. 
    In Sweden the name "Land Surveyor" is unknown to
    most Swedes. The Educational Board in Lund has seriously discussed to change
    the name of the Educational Program. However the Board has not been able to
    find a more suitable name. Therefore the Board has decided to market the
    trademark "Land Surveyor". 
    If it is easy to be accepted to an Educational Program, the
    Program looses in interest and status among the students. It is therefore
    important to get both a lot of applicants and a high entrance-points. 
    In Lund we have managed to raise the numbers of applicants
    as well as the level of entrance. 
    
      
        | Year | 
        1997     | 
        1998    | 
        1999    | 
        2000    | 
        2001    | 
       
      
        | First hand applicants | 
        38 | 
        33 | 
        46 | 
        50 | 
        59 | 
       
      
        | First hand applicants per seat | 
        1.3 | 
        1.2 | 
        1.5 | 
        1.7 | 
        2.0 | 
       
      
        | Total number of applicants | 
        387 | 
        356 | 
        395 | 
        386 | 
        443 | 
       
      
        | Total number of applicants per seat        | 
        13 | 
        12 | 
        13 | 
        13 | 
        15 | 
       
      
        | Entrance points  | 
          | 
          | 
          | 
        13.42  | 
        15.84 | 
       
     
    (15 points means the testimonial "very well" in
    all subjects. "20 points means the maximum testimonial in all subjects) 
    The women nowadays are equal with men or in majority at the
    Surveying Program. 
    Accepted women to the Surveying Program at Lund Technical
    Institute 
    
      
        | Year    | 
        Total    | 
        Women    | 
        %
          women    | 
       
      
        | 1992               | 
        33 | 
        18 | 
        54.5 | 
       
      
        | 1993 | 
        33 | 
        13 | 
        39.4 | 
       
      
        | 1994 | 
        33  | 
        14 | 
        42.4 | 
       
      
        | 1995 | 
        33 | 
        16 | 
        48.5 | 
       
      
        | 1996 | 
        31 | 
        17 | 
        54.8 | 
       
      
        | 1997 | 
        33 | 
        20 | 
        60.6 | 
       
      
        | 1998 | 
        33 | 
        18 | 
        54.5 | 
       
      
        | 1999 | 
        42 | 
        20 | 
        47.6 | 
       
      
        | 2000 | 
        50 | 
        23 | 
        46.0 | 
       
      
        | 2001 | 
        35 | 
        17 | 
        48.6 | 
       
      
        |   | 
        356 | 
        176 | 
        49.4 | 
       
     
    All the students at the Surveying Program at Lund were asked
    to answer the question "Why they had chosen the Surveying Program"
    in order to investigate if there is a difference in attitude between the
    boys and the girls. 
    Why did You choose the Surveying Program 
    
      
        |   | 
        Girls | 
        Boys | 
        Total | 
       
      
        |   | 
        Number      | 
        % | 
        Number     | 
        % | 
        Number    | 
        % | 
       
      
        | Interest | 
        24 | 
        45.3     | 
        17 | 
        40.5 | 
        41 | 
        43.2    | 
       
      
        | The education has good reputation | 
        2 | 
        3.8 | 
        1 | 
        2.4 | 
        3 | 
        3.2 | 
       
      
        | The width of the education is
          attractive     | 
        44 | 
        83.0 | 
        28 | 
        66.7     | 
        72 | 
        75.8 | 
       
      
        | The facultative education is extensive | 
        2 | 
        3.8 | 
        5 | 
        11.9 | 
        7 | 
        7.4 | 
       
      
        | Interested in certain specialisation | 
        12 | 
        22.6 | 
        11 | 
        26.2 | 
        23 | 
        24.2 | 
       
      
        | Interested in future tasks | 
        18 | 
        34.0 | 
        12 | 
        28.6 | 
        30 | 
        31.6 | 
       
      
        | Expectations of a high salary | 
        8 | 
        15.1 | 
        13 | 
        31.0 | 
        21 | 
        22.1 | 
       
      
        | Wanted to become MSc. | 
        28 | 
        52.8 | 
        26 | 
        61.9 | 
        54 | 
        56.8 | 
       
      
        | Relatives in the occupation | 
        2 | 
        3.8 | 
        8 | 
        19.0 | 
        14 | 
        14.7 | 
       
      
        | Others | 
        6 | 
        11.3 | 
        8 | 
        19.0 | 
        14 | 
        14.7 | 
       
      
        |   | 
        146 | 
          | 
        126 | 
        272 | 
          | 
          | 
       
     
    As can be seen, there is no significant difference between
    the reasons why a boy or a girl has chosen the Surveying Program. 
    The Surveying Program is not the most popular Program among
    the young women. As can be seen from the table the Biotechnology Program
    together with the Chemical Program is the most attractive Program among the
    young women. These Programs are considered technical of a "softer"
    kind. The students need not to study hard technical subjects for example
    about concrete, etc. Next the young women go for the artistic programs as
    Architecture and Industrial Design. The Surveying Program follows after
    these chemical and artistic Programs. 
    The most important factor for the young women to choose the
    Surveying Program is the width of the education. The combination techniques,
    laws and economics is of importance and attracts those who wants to get a
    MSc 
    Important in itself for the students at the Surveying
    Program is to become MSc without studying a lot of technical subjects as
    physics, tenacity, etc. The students often points out how important it is to
    get a technical academic exam. Discussions have taken place to increase the
    number of applicants by decreasing the entrance qualifications and accept
    those with lower mathematic competence. This will lead to a non-technical
    MSc and will make the education less attractive for a lot of applicants. It
    will also give Sweden a new kind of Surveyors. So far there has been no
    proposal. 
    We find the interest of the occupation first in third place.
    This factor has for the students at LTH as a whole, the highest ranking. But
    it is a well-known fact, that the students applying for a seat in the
    Surveying Program, has no or very little knowledge about the education and
    the future tasks related to the education. The students choose the Program
    by the two reasons mentioned above. Those students who have marked the
    factor "Interest" have also to a great extend marked the factors
    "Interested in future tasks" and "Interested in certain
    specialization". These students want often to specialize in Real Estate
    Valuation or Real Estate Management. 
    The Surveying Program attracts young women by being a MSc-education
    with a lot of non-technical subjects. The combination techniques, laws and
    economics is the trade-mark of the education. The young women is in majority
    and sets the level of the social life at the Program. This is of importance
    when marketing the education. 
    by Boo Lilje, Sweden; e-mail: boo.lilje@telia.com  
  
       
       
      
        
          | 
       
       Editor:  Chair of the Joint Commission Working
      Group on Under-represented Groups in 
      Surveying  Ms. Gabriele Dasse, c/o Amt für Geoinformation und
      Vermessung, Postfach 10 05 04, D-20003 Hamburg, Germany 
      E-mail: gabriele.dasse@gv.hamburg.de 
      Tel.: + 49 40 428 26 5345 
      1/02, month of issue: July 
      © Copyright 2002 Gabriele Dasse.  Permission is 
      granted to photocopy in limited quantity for educational 
      purposes.  Other requests 
      to photocopy or otherwise reproduce material in this newsletter should be 
      addressed to the Editor.
    
           
           | 
         
       
 |